Медіа: Shpalta

Gender Sensitivity and Respect for Diversity as the Foundation of Editorial Culture

The editorial team developed and published a Gender Sensitivity Policy on its website. View the policy Work on the document took place during the team’s participation in a mentoring program on gender-sensitive journalism that lasted from May to October 2025. According to the outlet, adopting the policy became an important step toward clearly defining the editorial direction, improving internal communication, maintaining gender balance in reporting, and systematically upholding gender-sensitive standards.

Although mutual understanding and respect for diversity had already been present within the team, the written policy helped formalize these principles and establish a shared reference point for all staff members. The newsroom now consciously produces content using gender-sensitive approaches.

The team includes a representative of the LGBT community, and colleagues respect and accept his identity, support him, and share the declared editorial values. According to the newsroom, daily interaction within a common working environment has contributed to greater tolerance and acceptance of LGBT people among staff members.

The editorial team has also systematically used feminine professional titles (feminitives) in its content since the outlet was founded in 2017. This practice is considered part of the media outlet’s educational mission and reflects its core message: “observe, analyze, act.” The newsroom emphasizes that the use of feminitives is an element of its public awareness and educational work with audiences.

At the same time, the outlet notes that some initiatives have not yet been implemented due to limited financial resources. In particular, this concerns the introduction of systematic support for parenthood and caregiving within the team, which currently remains difficult to implement for financial reasons.

Gender Inequality in Public Space: Bodily Autonomy, Ethics, and Double Standards

Context

In everyday public space, unwritten gender rules continue to define how women and men are “allowed” or “not allowed” to look. Nudity, clothing, and ideas of “decency” are often treated as matters of personal taste or morality, yet they reflect deeper mechanisms of social control and inequality.

Women’s bodies are far more frequently subjected to judgment, sexualization, and stigmatization in public space, while similar behavior by men is often considered socially acceptable or neutral. Such double standards rarely become the subject of systematic media analysis, especially at the local level.

What Was Done

The online publication Shpalta produced an interview-based analytical article examining gender inequality in attitudes toward bodily autonomy and nudity in public space.

The article:

  • explored why men are socially permitted to appear shirtless or in informal clothing in public places, while women are stigmatized for similar behavior;
  • analyzed the mechanisms of sexualization of women’s bodies;
  • demonstrated how labels such as “prostitute” or “temptress” function as tools of social pressure and control;
  • moved beyond individual incidents to offer a broader examination of cultural and social norms that sustain inequality.

How It Was Implemented

The material was presented as an analytical interview that went beyond discussing appearance itself.

The editorial team:

  • shifted the focus from moral judgments to ethical, cultural, and power-related mechanisms;
  • used accessible, non-academic language;
  • relied on everyday experiences familiar to readers, allowing them to recognize situations from their own lives.

This approach made a complex gender issue understandable to a broad audience and opened space for reflection.

Olha Maksymiuk, Editor-in-Chief of Shpalta:

“This article is about why and where men have ‘granted themselves’ the right to walk around shirtless, with an unbuttoned shirt, or even in home shorts in public places. And at the same time, why women—even in hot weather, when a bra causes discomfort, or simply because they want their bodies to breathe—cannot be topless without immediately risking labels such as ‘prostitute’ or ‘temptress.’ The author sought to understand whether this is only about nudity or about deeper mechanisms of control over women’s bodies. We received many reactions, comments, and responses from readers who said the topic is important, relevant, and rarely discussed openly in Ukrainian media.”

Impact

The publication generated strong audience engagement through numerous comments, discussions, and responses. Readers:

  • emphasized the relevance of the topic;
  • noted that issues of bodily autonomy and double standards are rarely addressed in depth by Ukrainian media;
  • shared their own experiences of stigmatization and social pressure.

The article encouraged audiences to rethink what is considered “normal” in public space and challenged established gender norms.

What Other Media Can Learn From This

  • Address everyday forms of gender inequality that may seem “minor” but have significant social consequences.
  • Analyze bodily autonomy, ethics, and notions of decency through the lens of rights and equality, rather than morality or subjective judgment.
  • Use interviews as analytical tools, providing context and explanation rather than merely transmitting opinions.
  • Speak the language of everyday experience, making complex gender issues relatable and understandable.
  • Create safe spaces for discussion, where readers can reflect on familiar situations and share their own observations.