Overcoming Gender Stereotypes in Fatherhood Through Local Journalism

Context

Gender stereotypes about fatherhood remain deeply rooted in Ukrainian society: childrearing is often perceived as a “woman’s responsibility,” while men’s caregiving role is undervalued or treated as exceptional. In the context of war, loss, and the disruption of family structures, these perceptions require particular reconsideration.

For frontline communities in the Kharkiv region, stories of families who survived occupation and continue living through wartime become an important source of social support and normalization of diverse family models.

What was done

The Hromada.Group editorial team published a social-profile feature about Oleh Mykhailiev, a history teacher from Artemivka in the Pechenihy community, who has been raising three children alone after the death of his wife.

The article:

  • presents the experience of a single father without appealing to pity or sensationalism;
  • shows a man’s daily responsibility and care as a normal part of fatherhood;
  • describes the family’s experience of surviving Russian occupation and adapting to life during the war.

How it was implemented

The article was produced in the format of a social portrait focused on the family’s everyday life.

The journalistic approach included:

  • a detailed description of the family’s story and the daily challenges of raising children;
  • a conscious avoidance of heroization, dramatization, or emotional pressure on readers;
  • a focus on the father’s role as caregiver, educator, and a stable figure in the children’s lives;
  • adherence to ethical standards regarding children’s privacy.

Olena Zelenina, Head of the Analytical Department of the Hromada.Group local media network in Kharkiv region, noted:

“The topic of ‘a dad on parental leave’ is almost absent from Ukrainian media. Perhaps because very few fathers use this opportunity. According to various estimates, only 2–3% of fathers take parental leave, which is significantly lower than in many European countries, although public opinion surveys show that a large share of Ukrainians consider it normal when a woman earns more than a man. In reality, however, stereotypes still limit this practice.”

She also emphasized that stereotypes in the portrayal of fatherhood are reinforced by exceptional cases. According to her, when media focus only on “ideal” fathers or, conversely, “terrible” fathers, they create an unrealistic background for most people. Therefore, avoiding moralizing judgments is one of the best safeguards against reproducing stereotypes in coverage of fatherhood.

Zelenina further stressed the importance of balancing public interest with children’s privacy. In sensitive cases, she recommends changing names and avoiding identifiable locations such as schools or neighborhoods. Journalists should explain not only where the material will be published, but also what reactions and comments may appear online, so that participants understand the implications of a permanent digital footprint. At the same time, she emphasized that journalists must never pressure people to relive painful experiences for emotional effect or a stronger headline.

Impact

The publication helps challenge the stereotype that parenting is exclusively a “female sphere” and increases the visibility of men as responsible and engaged fathers.

The article also:

  • supports public acceptance of diverse family models;
  • demonstrates how local journalism can address sensitive social issues without stigmatization;
  • fosters empathetic understanding of families living in frontline communities.

What other media can learn from this

  • Cover male caregiving without sensationalism or exoticization, avoiding framing it as an “exception” or a “heroic act.”
  • Avoid pity-oriented language and excessive heroization, focusing instead on responsibility and everyday care.
  • Portray fatherhood as an ongoing process, not merely a reaction to tragedy or loss.
  • Challenge gender stereotypes through normalization, allowing the story itself to convey the message.
  • Address social issues through concrete human stories, rather than abstract generalizations.
  • Take into account the local context of war and occupation, showing the resilience of communities and families.
  • Apply strong ethical standards regarding children’s privacy, never using children as emotional tools.

Veteran Voice and Media Literacy as a Component of Community Resilience

What has been done

The Hromada. Group local media network practices creating separate editorial spaces for authors who are also veterans. For instance, the newsroom started a special blog for a veteran of the Russia-Ukraine war, writer Mykhailo Filonenko, who was seriously injured in combat in the Kharkiv oblast and lost his hands and partly his eyesight. The author thus obtained his own information platform, where he fulfills his creative ideas, publishing materials about Ukrainian folklore, memory, and the connection between generations through traditional images.

In addition, Hromada. Group carries out systematic work with future journalists and young university students. The media network serves as a platform for media students to acquire practical experience, including those from S. Kuznets Kharkiv National Economic University and the Kharkiv Culture Academy.

The newsroom points out they are interested in engaging young journalists more, but they were forced to let go of some young professionals due to the loss of funding from USAID. At the same time, the team has plans to expand the network and create new offices in communities if funding resumes or new funding opportunities arise.

The newsroom also engages in combating disinformation and attempts of the Russian special services to recruit young people. This is done both through analytical journalistic materials and through editors’ participation in thematic trainings. In July and August 2025, Hromada. Group representatives participated as speakers in joint Ukrainian-Lithuanian workshops dedicated to combating the recruitment of young people by Russian special services. These events were aimed at young Lithuanians and Ukrainians and were attended by journalists, civil society organizations, and educators from the Krasnokutska community of the Kharkiv region. Like Ukraine, Lithuania sees attempts to recruit young people, both locals and Ukrainian immigrants, for subversive activities.